Where Should You Start?

Most clients begin with a PFEM test and then move on to one of three places:

  • Signal Pulse - if you want to know whether AI influence is already material

  • Governability Briefing - if leadership needs clarity immediately

  • Exposure Pulse - if AI is embedded and exposure is likely accumulating

If external scrutiny is already present, Control Pulse is the urgent step.

Luminary Diagnostics Is Not Consultancy

We do not implement governance programmes. We do not provide advisory transformation services. We provide:

Point in time Diagnostic instruments that determine whether governability truth exists - and what should come next. We do not attempt to generate consultancy revenue, we exist solely to indicate where companies may be exposed to human ownership or authority related risk

The Question the World Will Ask

The shift is inevitable: Organisations will be examined on whether legitimate human authority over AI action can be proven. Luminary exists to answer that question before someone else does.

Ready to Begin?

Start with a PFEM test and then move to the full diagnostic tests

Order GOVERNABILITY BRIEFING
Order CONTROL Pulse
AI Governability Diagnostics are the instruments that determine whether human authority still holds

AI governance is no longer about policies, intent, or maturity models. The world has already shifted. What matters now is whether an organisation can prove, at the point of action, that legitimate human authority exists over synthetic influence.

Luminary Diagnostics provides the first coherent diagnostic suite designed to answer one institutional question:

Is your organisation’s AI influence governable - or not?

These are not consulting engagements. They are structured diagnostic instruments that surface governability truth and define the next assurance step.

AI governability cannot be assessed in one jump. It must be determined through a progression, with each Luminary instrument answering a distinct question.

Further details on each of the diagnostics can be found in the individual pages. Summaries are as follows:

2. Signal Pulse

Is AI influence materially present here at all?

Most organisations already have AI shaping outcomes — often invisibly, through tools, vendors, and workflow dependency. Signal Pulse is the threshold diagnostic. It determines whether AI influence is already credible enough that governability questions apply.

Best for: Any medium-sized organisation and above
Format: Fully automated
Outcome: Signal present / No signal / Indeterminate

→ If Signal is present, the next step is Governability Briefing or Exposure Pulse.

3. Governability Briefing

Do we clearly understand what governability requires here - and what must be true to credibly claim control?

Senior leaders are increasingly being asked questions they cannot comfortably answer:

  • Who owns AI-shaped outcomes?

  • Can it be stopped?

  • Is it defensible?

The Governability Briefing is the fastest entry point into clarity.

A structured 1:1 diagnostic session that explains what governability requires in your context - and what the next assurance step must be.

Best for: Heads of Risk, CROs, governance leaders
Format: 90–120 minute confidential briefing
Outcome: Briefing Note + pathway to Control Pulse

5. Control Pulse

Can a specific human be shown to hold real authority over AI-shaped decisions at the moment they matter?

Most organisations assume they have control because governance exists on paper. Control Pulse determines whether authority is operational:

  • stoppability at the point of action

  • enforceable override

  • accountable human control under scrutiny

This is where governability becomes evidence.

Best for: Regulated firms, insurers, boards demanding proof
Format: Deep structured control review
Outcome: Control Pulse report + assurance pathway

1. Pre-Failure Exposure Map (PFEM)

Where is this system most likely to fail?

Most organisations discover structural failure at the worst possible moment. The Pre-Failure Stress Map reveals exactly where your system will break under pressure, before it does. Not a risk register. Not a maturity model. A constitutional stress determination derived entirely from your own answers in a single 90-minute guided session.

4. Exposure Pulse

Where is AI influence creating material exposure through dependency, invisibility, or unclear responsibility?

Once AI influence exists, exposure accumulates faster than most organisations realise. Exposure Pulse will indicate where vulnerability is already forming across the enterprise:

  • hidden dependencies

  • unclear accountability

  • areas hardest to defend under scrutiny

Completed by five participants across key functions, fully automated.

Best for: Organisations with AI embedded in operations
Format: Automated multi-respondent diagnostic
Outcome: Enterprise exposure map + next-step recommendation

£10,000

£997

£50,000

£25,000

Currently being refreshed

£6,000

Best for: Heads of Risk, CROs, Boards, and anyone responsible for high-stakes systems
Format: 90-minute facilitated session, followed by a board-ready stress determination report delivered within 10 days
Outcome: A populated RAG stress map showing exactly where your system is green, amber, or red under pressure — and a five-paragraph constitutional narrative explaining where failure will emerge and why

Order PFEM

(Founding cohort available at £4,500 for limited time)

Currently being refreshed