When PFEM is used

PFEM is used when a system, programme, or decision process is operating — but no one has tested whether the governance conditions that are assumed to exist actually hold under pressure. It is appropriate in environments where:
  • Ownership of AI-influenced decisions is named but never tested
  • Authority exists on paper but has not been exercised against a real failure
  • Override mechanisms are in place but their real-world effectiveness is unknown
  • Dependencies are assumed to be managed but have not been interrogated
  • The board or regulator is beginning to ask questions that cannot yet be answered with evidence

In these conditions, proceeding without a pre-failure determination creates exposure that compounds silently until pressure arrives.

What PFEM does:
  • Reveals exactly where a system will break under pressure before it does
  • Populates a 4x4 Constitutional Stress Map across 16 known pre-failure conditions in Red, Amber, and Green states
  • Derives every finding from the buyer's own words in a structured 90-minute facilitated conversation
  • Produces a five-paragraph constitutional narrative naming where the structure will hold, deform, and break
  • Identifies the most plausible failure pathway and the single structural contradiction the board should address first

Where Will This System Break?
PFEM maps the pre-failure structural conditions present in your system right now - across ownership, authority timing, override reality, and dependency - against four constitutional tests: harm prevention, truthfulness, uncertainty handling, and opposition and stop-power.
What PFEM does not do:
  • Predict outcomes or assign probability to failure events
  • Assess maturity, score readiness, or produce compliance certificates
  • Make recommendations or prescribe governance programmes
  • Determine whether a system is safe, adequate, or defensible
  • Replace legal, regulatory, or audit obligations
  • Terms and Conditions Apply
Sixteen cells. Each one a known failure pattern. Derived from your own answers. Delivered as a board-ready determination.
The pre-failure window is open when the report lands. What the organisation does with it is its decision. What PFEM does is make sure that decision cannot be avoided.
Outputs
PFEM produces a board-ready Pre-Failure Stress Map report delivered within 10 working days of the session, containing:
  • Structural Red — likely to fail too late or invisibly under pressure
  • Action Zone (Amber) — material stress sensitivity requiring board attention
  • Works but needs watching (Yellow) — functioning but tempo-sensitive
  • Proven and exercised (Green) — holds under pressure
No output implies the system is safe, compliant, or adequately governed. PFEM is intentionally separated from remediation. Luminary Diagnostics does not prescribe what an organisation should do with its findings. Using this instrument to generate reassurance, claim governance adequacy, or satisfy a regulatory requirement is a misuse of the instrument.